Piper Sandler Maintains Overweight on NVIDIA, $150 Price Target
- Rating
- Buy
- Price target
- $150
- Implied upside
- +14%
- vs $131.29 prior close

Piper Sandler analyst Harsh Kumar reiterated an Overweight rating and $150 price target on NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA).
“All in all, we think that NVDA is poised to be flat to down into the print this week. We think that April quarter is poised for a miss in revenues largely from macro uncertainty and from the H20 ban.
The new re-spun China chip will likely be commercialized in the late part of the July quarter which could also impact July’s guide.
We note that for the most part the factors resulting in a miss are outside the company’s control.
Despite this, we see a strong back half of the year given HPC capex coming on strong coupled with macro forces improving driven by sovereign investments following the announcements of several large deals over recent weeks.
We advise investors to weather the uncertainty and stay long the stock as this is likely largely the last wave of negative news for NVDA this year. Reiterate OW rating.”
The price target and rating on this page are the opinion of the issuing research firm and its analyst, not of Price Target. This page is published for informational purposes only and is not investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Consider your own circumstances and consult a licensed financial adviser before making investment decisions.
This research note is reproduced verbatim from the issuing firm. Price Target never edits, paraphrases or alters analysts’ words — we only republish them in one place.
Tracking this call
Since this note+76% NVDA $131.29 → $230.48 (Oct 9) · target reached
This call✓ Target reached on Jun 25, 2025, 2 months after the note. Same target as this firm’s Apr 16, 2025 note, so it is scored there.
Firm track recordPiper Sandler: 81% of its 16 targets at least a year old were reached within 12 months (#9 of 20 firms); on NVIDIA, 4 of 4. Accuracy ranking →




